Partager l'article
With 12 million people with disabilities in France and the aging population, the demand for disabled persons is constantly growing. However, many Paratransit projects are struggling to achieve their goals. Our analysis of several dozen deployments in Europe reveals four recurring dysfunctions that compromise the success of these services. This summary presents the causes identified and the proven solutions.
1. Underestimating real local demand
The field observation
Let's take the fictional but common example of a community of municipalities in Hérault that launches a Paratransit service sized for 400 monthly trips. Six months later, ridership peaked at 160 trips. The preliminary study was limited to extrapolating departmental data without local investigation.
The main difficulty lies in identifying unexpressed needs. People with reduced mobility often develop coping strategies that mask their real transport needs. Moreover, some audiences - in particular elderly people living alone - remain poorly visible in conventional surveys.
Common methodological pitfalls
Online questionnaires mainly affect profiles that are already connected and autonomous in their procedures. Public meetings attract people who are used to citizen participation, not necessarily future Paratransit users. This approach biases the analysis and leads to undersizing the offer or poorly targeting niches.
What actually works
Field research remains irreplaceable. It involves going to nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, physiotherapy offices and medical centers to understand real flows.
Collaboration with specialized associations (APF France disability, FNATH, local associations) allows access to informal networks and to identify latent needs. These partnerships also facilitate the acceptance of the service by potential users.
2. Neglecting digital accessibility by design
An underestimated regulatory issue
Decree No. 2006-1657 imposes specific obligations in terms of the accessibility of public services. For Paratransit services, this concerns not only vehicles but also all digital tools: websites, mobile applications, information supports. However, there are many non-compliant interfaces RGAA 4 and WCGA.
Common technical mistakes
Digital accessibility problems affect several aspects: impossible keyboard navigation, insufficient contrasts for the visually impaired, lack of alternative descriptions for images, poorly marked forms. These flaws de facto exclude users of assistive technologies such as screen readers.
A recurring example: the schedules published only in scanned PDF. These documents remain illegible for assistive software and penalize visually impaired users. The solution involves structured formats (HTML, tagged PDF) and text alternatives.
The inclusive approach that works
The project Isigo in La Rochelle illustrates an exemplary approach. The reservation interface was designed from the beginning according to RGAA standards. The service offers three complementary channels: mobile application, website and telephone exchange open 7 days a week. This redundancy guarantees access to the service regardless of the usage profile.
3. Missizing operational resources
The temptation to calculate as accurately as possible
Budgetary pressure often pushes the fleet to be sized to a minimum. This accounting logic neglects the specificities of Paratransit : variability of demand, extended support times, the need for reserve vehicles to mitigate breakdowns. The result: services that work properly during off-peak hours but that fill up quickly.
Underestimated complexity factors
Paratransit has particular constraints compared to conventional transport. Boarding and disembarking times can vary from 2 to 10 minutes depending on the user profile. Last-minute cancellations (unavailability, health condition) represent 15 to 20% of bookings. These hazards require operational margins that theoretical calculations struggle to integrate.
The dynamic simulation approach
Communities that succeed in their sizing use simulation tools integrating local variables: population density, topography, seasonality, recurring events (markets, medical consultations). This modeling makes it possible to identify bottlenecks and to adjust the fleet accordingly.
Our Paratransit solutions integrate these simulation algorithms to optimize the initial sizing and then dynamically adjust the supply according to real demand. This adaptive approach avoids initial undersizing while controlling operating costs.
4. Insufficiently training field teams
Beyond traditional driving
Driving for PMR requires specific skills that experienced conventional transport drivers do not necessarily have. Mobility assistance, the management of user stress, and the use of accessibility equipment require particular expertise. Two hours of technical training is not enough to acquire these skills.
Complex everyday situations
Paratransit personnel face a variety of situations: user in a 150 kg electric wheelchair, disoriented person who no longer recognizes their home, falls during transport, chronic discomfort... These events, while infrequent, require appropriate responses that only comprehensive training can provide.
The complete training program
Effective Paratransit training covers three components: technical (handling equipment, securing chairs), relational (communication adapted to disabilities, management of anxiety-provoking situations) and safety (first aid, emergency evacuation). This initial training must be complemented by regular feedback and skills updating sessions.
Conclusion
These four points of vigilance concentrate most of the difficulties encountered during Paratransit deployments. Our experience shows that communities that invest in prior analysis, universal accessibility, adapted sizing and training obtain better user satisfaction, and a peaceful daily life.
Do you want to pool Paratransit & DRT? Consult our guide.
